Review Criteria

All submitted abstracts will be reviewed by the members of the Scientific Committee.

Review criteria for abstracts 

• Suitability for the topic. Does the abstract fit into the topic? Abstracts with inappropriate contents or commercial advertisements will be rejected.
• Quality of research goals. Appropriately chosen and documented methods, logical presentation and analysis of results, findings, inferences and conclusions.
• Novelty and significance of the work, and implications for practices, policies or further research. Considered as oral presentations will be only those contributions where significant results are already documented in the abstract in order to avoid a situation in which the "promises of the abstracts" cannot be fulfilled.
• Standard of writing, clear and logical presentation, appropriate style, lack of errors, ease of reading, correct grammar and spelling, conformance with specifications for length and format details.

Depending on the decision of the scientific committee, the author may be invited to hold an oral presentation or to present a poster at the conference. 

Please note: acceptance of the abstract does not guarantee acceptance of the paper for publishing in the conference proceedings.